Icon The New Alphabet

 

Icon "The Color Munifni Exists"

 

Icon A Deep Learning Framework For Character Motion Synthesis and Editing

 

Icon The Halting Problem and The Moral Arbitrator

 

Icon The Witness

 

Icon Four Seasons Crisp Omelette

 

Icon At the Bottom of the Elevator

 

Icon Tracing Functions in Python

 

Icon Still Things and Moving Things

 

Icon water.cpp

 

Icon Making Poetry in Piet

 

Icon Learning Motion Manifolds with Convolutional Autoencoders

 

Icon Learning an Inverse Rig Mapping for Character Animation

 

Icon Infinity Doesn't Exist

 

Icon Polyconf

 

Icon Raleigh

 

Icon The Skagerrak

 

Icon Printing a Stack Trace with MinGW

 

Icon The Border Pines

 

Icon You could have invented Parser Combinators

 

Icon Ready for the Fight

 

Icon Earthbound

 

Icon Turing Drawings

 

Icon Lost Child Announcement

 

Icon Shelter

 

Icon Data Science, how hard can it be?

 

Icon Denki Furo

 

Icon In Defence of the Unitype

 

Icon Maya Velocity Node

 

Icon Sandy Denny

 

Icon What type of Machine is the C Preprocessor?

 

Icon Which AI is more human?

 

Icon Gone Home

 

Icon Thoughts on Japan

 

Icon Can Computers Think?

 

Icon Counting Sheep & Infinity

 

Icon How Nature Builds Computers

 

Icon Painkillers

 

Icon Correct Box Sphere Intersection

 

Icon Avoiding Shader Conditionals

 

Icon Writing Portable OpenGL

 

Icon The Only Cable Car in Ireland

 

Icon Is the C Preprocessor Turing Complete?

 

Icon The aesthetics of code

 

Icon Issues with SDL on iOS and Android

 

Icon How I learned to stop worrying and love statistics

 

Icon PyMark

 

Icon AutoC Tools

 

Icon Scripting xNormal with Python

 

Icon Six Myths About Ray Tracing

 

Icon The Web Giants Will Fall

 

Icon PyAutoC

 

Icon The Pirate Song

 

Icon Dear Esther

 

Icon Unsharp Anti Aliasing

 

Icon The First Boy

 

Icon Parallel programming isn't hard, optimisation is.

 

Icon Skyrim

 

Icon Recognizing a language is solving a problem

 

Icon Could an animal learn to program?

 

Icon RAGE

 

Icon Pure Depth SSAO

 

Icon Synchronized in Python

 

Icon 3d Printing

 

Icon Real Time Graphics is Virtual Reality

 

Icon Painting Style Renderer

 

Icon A very hard problem

 

Icon Indie Development vs Modding

 

Icon Corange

 

Icon 3ds Max PLY Exporter

 

Icon A Case for the Technical Artist

 

Icon Enums

 

Icon Scorpions have won evolution

 

Icon Dirt and Ashes

 

Icon Lazy Python

 

Icon Subdivision Modelling

 

Icon The Owl

 

Icon Mouse Traps

 

Icon Updated Art Reel

 

Icon Tech Reel

 

Icon Graphics Aren't the Enemy

 

Icon On Being A Games Artist

 

Icon The Bluebird

 

Icon Everything2

 

Icon Duck Engine

 

Icon Boarding Preview

 

Icon Sailing Preview

 

Icon Exodus Village Flyover

 

Icon Art Reel

 

Icon LOL I DREW THIS DRAGON

 

Icon One Cat Just Leads To Another

The New Alphabet

Created on July 5, 2016, 2:51 p.m.

I enjoy thinking about the little patterns and inconsistencies that exist in everyday systems such as the alphabet. The alphabet is essentially a list of names we give to the letters which produce sounds in our language, and their order.

It might sound simple, but naming letters is actually a difficult task. The inherent problem is this - it is impossible for humans to produce the sound of a consonant without also making the sound of a vowel. This is because the vowel sounds are those that correspond to us actually blowing air out of our mouths, while the consonant sounds are like modifiers - ways of adjusting the air flow at the beginning or end of the sound.

This is why, for example, we can't just pronounce the sound of the letter b alone. We need to pair it with a vowel, E.G: b + a = 'bah', b + e = 'bee', b + o = 'boh', b + u = 'buh', or we can place the vowel in front a + b = 'ab', e + b = 'eb', i + b = 'ib'.

Probably when you read b you naturally pair it with the e vowel at the end ('bee'), not (for example) the a vowel at the end ('bah') because this is the conventional name for the letter. But actually there is nothing special about this pairing and any other vowel (or positioning) could have been picked when the letter was named. If we think about some other letter names, many don't do the same as b. For example f also pairs with e but with the vowel at the beginning ('ef'), and r pairs with a vowel at the beginning, but it is the a vowel ('ar').

Others act completely weirdly. The letter h is pronounced 'haich' - essentially an entirely different word, while the letter y is pronounced with a i vowel at the end and a w sound for the consonant ('wi') - and w itself is entirely bizarre, pronounced 'double-you'. Not to mention the symbol for w actually depicts two v symbols not u symbols! The French actually got this one correct - they call the letter 'double-vay'.

Most people never notice or care about this distinction. I think this is because vowels are scattered over the alphabet and the true reason for their distinction from consonants is never really made clear at school. To most people they are all just letters. But because we've noticed this inconsistency, let us imagine how we might put it straight. Here is my proposal for a new alphabet.


We'll start by putting all of the vowels at the beginning of the alphabet. The order can be aeiou because well, you know. This is at least the start of being more consistent. For their names - we'll just call them exactly the sound they make.

a ('ah')
e ('eh')
i ('ei')
o ('oh')
u ('uh')

One odd thing here is that it seems the names of e and i have sort of switched in this new alphabet - this might seem wrong, but if we actually think about their usage it starts to make sense - i (such as in 'pick' or 'pin') definitely produces a kind of 'squeakier' sound much more similar to name for e than i. Again this matches French, where the names are switched just like in this new alphabet.

Next we'll put the consonants in the remaining order. This time, instead of some random pattern we'll pair them with all with the e vowel at the end of the sound. This will leave many the same or similar, but fix a whole bunch that were odd or inconsistent. Lets get started:

b ('bee')
c ('chee')

'chee'? Huh? Shouldn't it be 'cee' same as before? Well, c is a bit of an difficult case because there are three letter in the alphabet with somewhat overlapping sounds - c, s and k. In most of the words you 'classically' associate with c such as 'cat' and 'cut' the sound is actually much more that of the letter k - that 'kuh' sound - so we need to save this sound for later on. The other common sound it makes, such as its name in the alphabet 'cee' or in words such as 'cinema' is more of an s sound - (E.G 'see', 'sea', 'sign', 'sound'). Again - we need to save this sound for later on since previously the letter s was pronounced with the vowel at the beginning ('es'). This leaves us with the only other sound c makes, which is the sound when it is accompanied by a h - such as 'cheese' or 'chess'. Because it is a combo with h it isn't a perfect fit, but this is the best we can do since these letters have so much overlap. 'chee' it is!

d ('dee')
f ('fee')
g ('ghee')

'ghee'? Again? Shouldn't it be 'gee'? This is a similar situation to before - the actual name the letter g has in the current alphabet is a sound much more associated with the letter j (that 'juh' sound). But unlike c, g doesn't ever really take this sound in normal language, and is almost always more of a 'guh' sound - 'gang', 'gun', etc not 'jang', 'jun'. So really this is how it should have always been. We can just make this 'guh' sound clearer by spelling it with a h.

h ('he')
j ('gee')
k ('key')
l ('lee')
m ('me')
n ('nee')
p ('pee')
q ('kwee')

Another pain is q, because it acts so oddly. Firstly, in spelling, it is always paired with a u - but this u isn't actually a real vowel and qu can't be pronounced on its own - it needs to be paired with another vowel E.G qu + i = 'quee', qu + a = 'quah'. Then, there are often very weird pronunciations for words with qs in such as the name of the letter itself which phonetically is said like 'kew'. It doesn't seem that q really has its own sound - the best fit I can think of is that in most places q sounds like a k and a w together - so lets stick with that.

r ('re')
s ('see')
t ('tee')
v ('vee')
w ('wee')
x ('uhee')

Ah, we've come to another trouble maker x. In English x has essentially two sounds - before vowels it takes on a z sound such as in 'xylophone' - and at the end of vowels it usually acts like a variation on the s consonant such as in 'box', which is pronounced 'boks'. If our pattern was to put the consonant sound at the end it might make sense to pick this sound and call the letter 'eeks' (as they do in French), but because we've picked putting the consonant at the beginning we're a bit stuck. Instead we can take inspiration from the IPA which uses x to mean the guttural noise used at the end of a word like 'loch' . Unfortunately this sound doesn't really exist in standard English or American English, is difficult to spell phonetically, and doesn't really pair nicely with the e vowel, but it does appear in several European languages and dialects (such as Scottish) so it is maybe the best we can do.

y ('yee')
z ('zee')

Just two left and both are straight forward. 'yee' of 'yee' fame and of course it is good to finally clear up the 'zed' vs 'zee' debate once and for all. Opps looks like the americans were right all along!

Now I just need to think of a catchy tune to go with it. Then I am sure it will catch on, although I am not so sure people will take the loss of their popular letter 'lmno' lightly.

github twitter rss